| Processes/products to evaluate |
Indicators of achievement |
Evaluation method |
Evaluation schedule |
| Report on current research on "literacy development through CLIL" |
Published on the Web |
International peer review by team of international experts including Cummins et al |
December 2013 |
| Design an alternative construct building on the distinction between BICS and CALP and drawing on research review |
Production of materials based on the construct |
Userfeedback:evaluation/feedback by teachers and learners in the study to test if the concept is operational and can be used for the design of the other outcomes.
The remainder of the products will be evaluated through the data collected and analysed from the trans-European classroom study, including the learners' views and measurement of literacy skills.
|
May 2014 |
| Guide "Towards Literacy" |
Acceptance by teachers and teacher-trainers |
Teacher questionnaires
Feedback from participants at NW and WS
|
November 2013 / After WS (spring 2015) |
| Self-evaluation guide |
Publication on the web |
Invite comments from users for peer review (again 2.0 technology methods)
Teacher questionnaires
Feedback from participants at NW
|
December 2013 |
| Exemplary teaching materials |
Content knowledge and
academic language production in both L1 and L2
|
Analysis of text production task (see above)
Feedback from participants at WS
|
October 2014 /
After WS (spring 2015)
|
| Information Booklet for stakeholders and policy makers |
Publication and distribution |
Feedback from destinataries |
November 2015 |