Search
en  fr  de
.
  1. Home
  2.  > 
    Programme
  3.  > 
    Programme 2016-2019
  4.  > 
    A guide to teacher competences for languages in education
  5.  > 
    Guide to resources

A guide to teacher competences for languages in education


INTRODUCTION
CATALOGUE OF INSTRUMENTS 
INSTRUMENTS
IN PRACTICE
EVOLVING INSTRUMENTS
COUNCIL OF EUROPE PRINCIPLES
TEACHER COMPETENCES - CONCLUSIONS

Instruments in practice
This section provides practical examples of how various instruments in the ‘Catalogue of instruments’ can be used through fictitious vignettes and suggestions (presented on the left), as well as actual examples of ways in which teacher educators and teachers in different countries have actually used them (listed on the right-hand side).

Scenarios describing different people using this Guide

Maria, a foreign language teacher in adult education

Michael, a secondary school manager

Claudia, a student teacher of foreign languages

Jan, a teacher educator for foreign languages

Florian, a student teacher at elementary school

Hannes, a subject teacher of math at the lower and upper secondary level

Linda, a subject teacher of History, lower and upper secondary

For what purposes can these resources be used?

Click on one of the titles below for some ideas how a specific group of users can make use of the resources.

Enseignants en exercice – soutien à la formation continue

Outils d'auto-évaluation et de réflexion :

  • Quelles compétences me seraient utiles dans mon travail ? En quoi seraient-elles utiles aujourd'hui et à l'avenir ?
  • Ai-je déjà développé cette compétence ? À quel point l'ai-je fait ?
  • Quelles autres compétences du cadre de référence dois-je développer ou renforcer ?

Soutien à l'auto-observation, à l'observation entre pairs, à la recherche en classe :

  • Dans mon propre enseignement (par exemple, enregistré sur vidéo ou documenté dans un portfolio), quels exemples puis-je voir de telle compétence / de telle sensibilité / de tel comportement ? Avec quelle efficacité pour les apprentissages ?
  • En ce qui concerne ces compétences, que puis-je apprendre en observant mes collègues ? Quelles questions serait-il utile d'aborder avec eux ?
  • Afin d'améliorer l'efficacité de notre enseignement, quel domaine de compétence serait-il utile de privilégier dans la recherche en classe ? etc.

Etc.

Enseignants en formation – cartographie des compétences professionnelles des enseignants, suivi des progrès
Orientation :
  • Quel est le champ de ma formation d’enseignant ? Quels sont les principes, les connaissances, les capacités, les prises de conscience, etc. qui doivent être couverts pendant le cursus ?
  • Quelles sont les attentes à mon égard à la fin de chaque module du cours et pour obtenir la certification d'enseignant ? 

Auto-évaluation et réflexion : 

  • Comment est-ce que je progresse dans l'acquisition de domaines spécifiques de connaissances, de capacités, de prise de conscience, etc. ? Où dois-je concentrer mes efforts à ce stade ?

Etc.

Formateurs travaillant dans le domaine de la formation initiale et continue des enseignants – ressources pour l'élaboration de curriculums, critères et indicateurs pour l'évaluation

Curriculums et ressources :

  • Compte tenu de ce groupe de participants et des objectifs du cursus, quelles sont les compétences (connaissances, capacités, prises de conscience, valeurs, etc.) sur lesquelles il convient de se concentrer dans ce cursus (cette partie de cursus) ?
  • Quelle devrait être la pondération entre ces éléments du cursus ? Quel équilibre choisir ? Quel niveau de compétence devrions-nous viser ?
  • Comment pouvons-nous relier aux compétences cibles les expériences et occasions d'apprentissage que nous pouvons proposer et développer, si nécessaire, de nouvelles activités et expériences pour les compléter ?
  • Pourrions-nous établir une correspondance entre les compétences visées dans nos cours existants et celles spécifiées dans un ou plusieurs des instruments afin de vérifier que la couverture est appropriée ?
  • Quelles ressources publiées devrions-nous choisir et quelles autres ressources devrions-nous élaborer pour favoriser le développement des compétences visées ?

Évaluation et auto-évaluation :

  • Pouvons-nous utiliser ces descripteurs pour guider notre évaluation des progrès des participants pendant le cursus et à la fin du cursus ?
  • Les descripteurs sont-ils utiles pour l'observation et l'évaluation des pratiques d'enseignement ?

Etc.

Gestionnaires et organismes travaillant avec les enseignants – encourager et accompagner la formation continue des enseignants, définir les profils des nouveaux enseignants, examiner périodiquement le travail des enseignants
Soutien à la formation continue des enseignants : 
  • Comment pouvons-nous repérer ensemble les points forts des enseignants, leurs éventuelles lacunes et le degré de développement de leurs compétences ?
  • Pouvons-nous relier les compétences présentes dans un ou plusieurs référentiels aux expériences et aux occasions de formation continue que nous pourrions offrir ?
  • Pouvons-nous utiliser un référentiel pour définir un parcours de formation continue pour chaque enseignant ou pour une équipe ?

Recrutement de nouveaux enseignants :

  • En utilisant un ou plusieurs référentiels pour établir des profils de compétences pour nos enseignants actuels et l'équipe dans son ensemble, pouvons-nous identifier les domaines spécifiques de compétence et d'expertise qui doivent être renforcés, afin de pouvoir sélectionner les enseignants qui ont ces compétences ?
  • Pouvons-nous élaborer des spécifications individuelles pour les nouveaux enseignants sur la base d'un ou de plusieurs référentiels, afin d'attirer le type de candidats adéquat pour les nouvelles embauches ? Pouvons-nous utiliser ces spécifications d'une manière ou d'une autre lors des entretiens avec les candidats ?

Examen des démarches et détermination des besoins en formation :

  • Pourrions-nous utiliser les indicateurs et les compétences proposées dans un ou plusieurs référentiels afin de fournir des points de focalisation et des critères pour l'observation des cours et les discussions de restitution qui les suivent ?
  • Comment pourrions-nous utiliser un ou plusieurs référentiels pour encourager les enseignants à évaluer leurs propres compétences et à partager ensuite avec nous leurs auto-évaluations lors de rencontres d'évaluation individuelles, afin de voir comment celles-ci se situent par rapport à nos propres évaluations de leurs compétences et de leurs performances ?
  • Si nous sélectionnons un référentiel comportant des étapes progressives de développement des compétences, pouvons-nous l'utiliser pour discuter avec les enseignants de la manière dont ils pourraient se perfectionner à l'avenir pour leur propre bénéfice et celui des apprenants ?

Etc.

Pratictising teachers – support for continuing professional development (CPD)

Tools for self-assessment and reflection:

  • ‘Which of these competences would be useful to me in my work? How would they be useful now and in the future?’
  • ‘Have I already developed this competence? To what extent?’
  • ‘Which other competences in the framework do I want to/need to develop further?’

Support for self-observation, peer-observation, classroom research:

  • ‘In my own teaching (for example, recorded on video or documented in a portfolio) what examples can I see of this competence/awareness/behaviour? How effective was it in supporting learning?’
  • ‘Referring to these competences, what can I learn from watching my colleagues? What issues would it be useful to discuss with them?’
  • ‘In order to enhance the effectiveness of our teaching, which area of competence would it be useful to focus on in classroom research?’ etc.

Etc.

Student teachers – mapping the professional competences of teachers, tracking progress

Orientation:

  • ‘What is the scope of my teacher education course? What principles, knowledge, skills, awareness etc. are to be covered during the course?’
  • ‘What standards are expected of me by the end of each module of the course, and in order to obtain certification as a teacher?’

Self-assessment and reflection:

  • ‘How am I progressing with the acquisition of specific areas of knowledge, skill, awareness etc.? Where should I concentrate my efforts at this time?’

Etc.

Teacher educators working in initial and in-service teacher education – resources for developing course programmes, criteria and indicators for assessment

Course programmes and resources:

  • ‘Given this group of participants and the aims of the programme, what competences (knowledge, skills, awareness, values etc.) should be focused on in this (part of the) course?’
  • ‘What should the weighting be between these elements of the programme? What would be a good balance? What level of development should we be aiming at?’
  • ‘How could we link our existing learning experiences and opportunities to the target competences and develop new activities and experiences to supplement these where necessary?’ 
  • Could we map the competences focused on in our existing courses against those specified in one or more of the frameworks to check that the coverage is appropriate?
  • Which published resources should we select and which other resources do we need to develop to support the development of the target competences?

Assessment and self-assessment:

  • ‘Can we use these descriptors to guide our assessment of participants’ progress during and at the end of the course?’
  • ‘Are the descriptors useful in observation and assessment of teaching practice?’

Etc.

Managers and organisations working with teachers – encouraging and supporting teachers’ CPD, specifying profiles of new teachers, reviewing teachers’ work periodically

Supporting teachers CPD:

  • ‘How can we together identify teachers’ areas of strength, any gaps, and how well-developed their competences are?’
  • ‘Can we link competences in one or more frameworks to CPD experiences and opportunities that we could support?’
  • ‘Can we use a framework to define a programme of CPD for each individual teacher or for a team?’

Recruiting new teachers:

  • ‘By using one or more frameworks, to build up competence profiles for our current teachers and the team as a whole can we identify the specific areas of competence and expertise that need to be strengthened so that we can select teachers who have those competences?’
  • ‘Can we prepare person specifications for new teachers based on one or more frameworks so that we attract the right kind of candidates for new appointments? Can we use these specifications in some way when interviewing candidates?’

Reviews of performance and CPD needs:

  • ‘Could we use the indicators and competences in one or more frameworks to provide focus points and criteria for lesson observation and feedback discussions afterwards?’
  • How could we use one or more frameworks to encourage teachers to assess their own competences and then share their self-assessments in individual review meetings to see how these compare with our own assessments of their competence and performance?
  • If we select a framework with progressive stages of competence development, can we use it to discuss with teachers how they could develop in the future for their own and the learners’ benefit?

Etc.

Practice examples of instruments in use

How are some teacher competence instruments used in practice? Below you can find a number of practice examples compiled by the project team, ordered alphabetically by the name of the instrument. Most examples refer to an instrument described in more detail in the Catalogue of instruments. Some were compiled during a large online survey in summer 2017.

British Council’s Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Framework
Almira Muric

Almira Muric employs both the British Council’s Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Framework (2015) and the European Portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) in her job as teacher at Donja Lovnica elementary school in Montenegro. She uses these instruments for self-assessment, for planning and managing courses, and as a tool to help her young colleagues. In her view, these frameworks are helpful in relation to self-assessment and in the promotion of 21st-century skills.

Canadian Language Portfolio for Teachers (CASLT)
Krystyna Baranowski foto

Krystyna Baranowski is Associate Professor at the Université de St-Boniface and teacher educator at the Faculty of Education, University of Manitoba. She uses the Canadian Language Portfolio for Teachers (CASLT) in combination with the Common European Framework (CEFR) for prospective teachers’ assessment in two regards, namely for students to autonomously track their progress and for student teachers to prepare for their study abroad in France. In her view, these instruments are especially useful for students to develop and enhance metacognition in language teaching. She has received feedback from students stating how enlightening and useful it was to understand the levels of the CEFR and to apply the CASLT to their own practices and abilities.

Eaquals Teacher Training and Development Framework (TD Framework) and E-Grid
Deniz Kurtoğlu Eken and colleagues

Deniz Kurtoğlu Eken and her colleagues at Sabancı University School of Languages (SL), Turkey, use the Eaquals Teacher Training and Development Framework (TD Framework) for their annual target setting practices and performance review reports effectively supported by the SL Director. These practices help teachers define their aims, implement their targets, and assess their own professional development. SL’s professional development team also uses it as a reference tool for developmental observations and in the planning of training courses. According to feedback from SL teachers, the TD Framework helps promote a positive attitude towards self-assessment through its emphasis on professional development and further improving teaching rather than evaluating performance.


Marianthi Karatsiori

Marianthi Karatsiori uses the Eaquals TD Framework and the European Profiling Grid (EPG) in her profession as teacher trainer of language teachers at the Hellenic Open University, Greece. In her view, the EPG is a useful reflection tool for students to self-evaluate their practices and competences, and to gain an awareness of the constraints imposed by their context. In addition, she asks students to relate the EPG to the national curriculum and the material (e.g. the course book) which they use in their classroom.

Linda Polkowski

In her functions as teacher manager and teacher trainer at the Anglolang Academy of English, UK, Linda Polkowski promotes the EAQUALS e-grid for teachers of content and language integrated learning (CLIL). In her view, the EAQUALS e-grid is a user-friendly instrument that offers teachers a means for self-assessment, and managers a tool to detect patterns and trends in language teachers’ development, as well as to reflect on training needs.

European Core Curriculum for Mainstreamed Second Language Teacher Education (EUCIM-TE)
Alain Girault

Christian Sinn, a teacher educator for German studies at the University of Teacher Education St.Gallen (German-speaking Switzerland), describes how he implemented a module for language-sensitive subject teaching in all subjects on the basis of EUCIM-TE. Read the entire practice example here (in German).

European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL)
Raili Hilden

Raili Hilden uses the EPOSTL in her profession as teacher trainer at the University of Helsinki in Finland. In her view, the descriptors are useful for prospective foreign language teachers with reference to lesson plans, to assess and report student activity and to raise awareness of various components of teaching a language. However some students have reported that they found the document, despite its usefulness, very time-consuming. Further, she uses the EPOSTL in combination with the CEFR and the Europass, for instance to compile a digital CV for students’ job applications. She states that teacher networking and cooperation with fellow teachers in language and other subject fields is not addressed in the EPOSTL. These aspects are very prominent, though, in the current discussion and the core curricula in Finland.

Vega Llorente Pinto

Vega Llorente Pinto from the Escuela Oficial de Idiomas de Salamanca in Spain uses the EPOSTL with adult students training to become foreign language teachers. She employs the instrument as a means for self-assessment and to reflect on general questions relating to teaching. She uses the instrument in combination with the FREPA, the Framework of Reference for Pluralistic Approaches, in order to enhance awareness for plurilingual and intercultural competences.

Evgeniia Sheveleva

Evgeniia Sheveleva educates students training to become foreign language teachers at Moscow State Linguistic University, Russia. She finds the EPOSTL invaluable for teacher education as it encourages students to reflect on and assess their professional competences and to experiment with methodologies to enhance their professional awareness. In her view, the content can be well-adjusted to the individual teaching environment while simultaneously creating a link to fundamental principles of foreign language teaching formulated in European documents (e.g. the CEFR), and integrating this content into the teaching process.

Anne Dragemark Oscarson

Anne Dragemark Oscarson is senior lecturer at the Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. As a teacher educator, she uses those parts of the EPOSTL which are relevant to the curriculum of the specific teaching context in her country. Her students use the instrument for self-assessment in order to enhance awareness of their progress. While she aims to integrate the use of the EPOSTL throughout student teachers’ education, the main focus is on the first year of language studies in English and the last teacher training period.

Adriana Arcuri

Adriana Arcuri (on the right, receiving the European Language Label) educates prospective foreign language teachers at Università degli studi di Palermo in Italy. She uses the EPOSTL self-assessment descriptors in her course on professional assessment tools ('Strumenti per la professionalità riflessiva'), by asking her students to write observation grids on the basis of the self-assessment descriptors. In her view, the EPOSTL is a useful means to show to students the many aspects relevant for their future practice.

Larisa Kasumagic Kafedzic

Larisa Kasumagic Kafedzic is an assistant professor in language pedagogy at the English Department of the University of Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina. She teaches university students in foreign language didactics and has incorporated the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL) into her teaching for a couple of years now in order to help students reflect on their professional development.
Read the entire interview here

European Profile for Language Teacher Education
Cristina Bosisio

Cristina Bosisio works as a teacher educator at the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Milan, Italy. She uses the European Profile for Language Teacher Education (Kelly & Grenfell, 2004) in combination with EPOSTL to highlight and reflect on the language skills necessary for language teachers. In her opinion, the instrument is especially useful for training purposes in plurilingual and intercultural education. However, she believes there remains a need to not only address foreign language teachers, but all teachers, as in fact all teachers convey (and teach) a language with their discipline.

Marianthi Karatsiori

In the context of a research project, teacher trainer Marianthi Karatsiori has used the European Profile for Language Teacher Education—a Frame of Reference-EPLTE (European Commission, 2004) to identify the competences developed through the official academic curricula addressed to perspective teachers of English and French. The 40 key-elements of EPLTE, separated in four categories (Structure, Knowledge and Understanding, Strategies and Skills, Values) were used as evaluation criteria to recognize best practices among Universities and to investigate the possibility of a European common curriculum for teachers of TEFL. 27 academic curricula addressed to perspective teachers of English and 25 academic curricula addressed to perspective teachers of French were examined for the survey. Each academic curriculum was from a different country, member state of the ECML.

European Profiling Grid (EPG)

Pierangela Diadori

Pierangela Diadori is a teacher trainer at the University for Foreigners of Siena, Italy. She has been using the EPG in its entirety to compare the descriptors of the six development phases with the prerequisites, knowledge and skills required for the three existing Italian Language Teaching certifications (DITALS of the Università per Stranieri di Siena, DILS-PG of the Università per Stranieri di Perugia, CEDILS (of the Università di Venezia). Although the EPG has proven a useful guideline to discuss key competences of Italian language teachers in training courses, Pierangela has located the need for a complementary tool. She sees the EPG as more specifically geared towards non-native teachers, whereas in her context, most teachers have Italian as a first language.

Cecilia Nihlén

Cecilia Nihlén works at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, as a teacher educator of university students training to become foreign language teachers. She has used the EPOSTL, particularly the section ‘assessment’, in the teacher education program. Many of the EPOSTL assessment descriptors have been translated to Swedish and are available on the Swedish National Agency for Education's website as part of an assessment training package for teachers. In her view, the EPOSTL provides excellent descriptors which encourage discussion among student teachers. However, since working with the EPOSTL is rather time-consuming, she would appreciate a digital database with the descriptors so teacher educators could select which ones the students could work with more easily.

Référentiel des compétences professionnelles des métiers du professorat et de l'éducation
Alain Girault

Alain Girault from the Université Grenoble Alpes in France makes use of the Référentiel des compétences professionnelles des métiers du professorat et de l'éducation (‘Professional competency framework for the fields of teaching and education’) in his job as educator, teacher trainer in didactics, and education inspector. He describes how the instrument is used during inspections of teachers, both for their self-evaluation and the inspector’s assessment of their skills. It provides a number of detailed descriptors, though not, as he notes, graded scales. The instrument is also used by the trainee teachers and the professors responsible for their traineeship both at the university and at the assigned school.

Teacher Effectiveness for Language Learning (TELL) framework
Jeff Bale

Jeff Bale is a teacher educator at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Canada. He uses the Teacher Effectiveness for Language Learning (TELL) framework in teacher education programs for future foreign language teachers. The instrument was developed for practicing teachers to help them plan and carry out their own professional development, and as a resource for teacher coaching. While the framework was originally designed for professional development of in-service language teachers, Bale has adapted this framework for use with language-teacher candidates. The framework breaks down the specific moves that effective language teachers make into extremely concrete, manageable chunks that helps novice teachers see what “good teaching” looks like. Bale notes that these materials were designed in the United States in the context of controversial educational policies, namely the use of standardized test results and high-stakes observations and evaluations of teacher practice for annual evaluation and as basis for raises. Importantly, the authors of this framework have been careful to avoid evaluative language and focus on descriptive language to best support language teachers in developing their practice.

Further practice examples
Bettina Imgrund

Bettina Imgrund is a teacher educator at Pädagogische Hochschule Thurgau in German-speaking Switzerland. Her practice example describes how she implemented an empirically-based model for foreign language teaching methodology, the Hamburger Modell, into the initial education of lower secondary teachers for French as a foreign language. Read the entire practice example here (in German).